Are there any intellectually honest Creationists…or is that an oxymoron? – VIDEO

11

A new year and already been inundated with the most uneducated, lying, intellectually dishonest creationists imaginable. Why is this? What is the underlying factors which make creationists so dishonest? Lets discuss. (I encourage my English friends to join as you keep saying I have them at odd hours for you!). To JOIN LIVE: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/hoaevent/AP36tYdJm8rsFw8jUXYMAi_CAfnyLog_1J4D-5DmTUdmi2dZJ17_ZQ?hl=en&authuser=0

[ccw-atrib-link]


Share.

11
Leave a Reply

11 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Fred Pickles

I understood what Fiona was trying to say about abiogenesis and she is correct. Creatards like me say abiogenesis (spontaneous generation, take your pick) is impossible, or at the very least has never been observed. Truthfully, the Genesis story (for us creatards) asserts abiogenesis as God directing first life from non-living materials in the earth. The terms should probably be defined better as directed abiogenesis and undirected abiogenesis. Or purposed abiogenesis and non-purposed abiogenesis? I don't know. That being said, all this arguing over terms and definitions seems to me a bunch of intellectual, coffee shop, pseudo philosophical claptrap. People… Read more »

Baltasar b

Dont recall the KCA argument came up here. Funny to see how everyone are laughing their a. of when a simpelton like me persist that it isnt a God of the gaps argument, and never gets a chance to explain. A bunch of people laughing at a fact that most professional philosophers – including the atheists- agree upon: KCA is NOT a God of the gap argument.

No Name
No Name

Evolution is ridiculous there is no way an eye or a finger can "evolve" by random chance.

F!@#Guilt

This is my response to this hangout topic. I actually don't think theists are dishonest. The video explains why.

Hope someone finds it interesting.

Steve McRae

Lets review Stevie's claims so far:
1) "Speciation doesn't happen" – I demonstrated he was wrong.
2) "Pharyngeal slits do not exist in human embryos" – I demonstrated he was wrong.
3) "There are no transitional fossils." – I demonstrated he was wrong.
4) "Evolution does not happen today" – I demonstrated he was wrong.

Are there any intellectually honest Creationists?????? He sure isn't one.

Steve McRae

So Stevie Dalpe now resorts to plagiarism in order to make his arguments.
His quote: "A common evolutionary claim is that the pharyngeal arches of the human are vestigial gill slits, but these pharyngeal arches are neither gills nor slits! "
Creation.com "Another common evolutionary claim is that the pharyngeal arches of the human are vestigial gill slits, but these pharyngeal arches are neither gills nor slits!"

We call this PLAGIARISM where I am from….

Steve McRae

Even though Stevie Dalpe didn't show for the hangout…he has exemplified what an intellectually dishonest creationist looks like on this page.

Stevie Dalpe

This is a hard show to watch. A bunch of angry atheist unable to admit they have to have faith in their beliefs.

RT @holesinthefoam: Are there any intellectually honest … – https://t.co/k4GrdYdrav #Atheism #CreationistIdiots https://t.co/dKEmOtanfA

why, yes – virginia….it IS an oxymoron.