Yeah, birth control, Pearl Harbor, I always seem to mix them up… :P

18

 
Liked it? Take a second to support Tony on Patreon!
Share.
Comments
  • Steven Paul Shilleto
    Steven Paul Shilleto December 7, 2013 at 1:06 pm

    How the F”@#$ is that an attack on religious freedom?!?!?!?

  • Thomas R. Dorsey-Payton
    Thomas R. Dorsey-Payton December 7, 2013 at 1:07 pm

    Those are exactly the same, SMH

  • Seán Boström
    Seán Boström December 7, 2013 at 1:07 pm

    How offensive to the memory of those lost.
    What an arse!

  • David Peters
    David Peters December 7, 2013 at 1:10 pm

    I hope he keeps up the good work. Comments as stupid as this are the sort of thing that is making the young rethink their religious affiliations and vote with their feet.

  • Paul Fitzgerald
    Paul Fitzgerald December 7, 2013 at 2:26 pm

    Well said, David.

  • Gary Goodson
    Gary Goodson December 7, 2013 at 2:30 pm

    It’s not about freedom of religion. It’s about freedom of conscience and it has to work both ways, secular and religious. Just as it’s not right for government to force distribution of bibles in public schools, it’s not right for government to force employers to offer insurance benefits that they find morally offensive. A government operating properly within its constitutional limits engages in neither. Not to say the comparison to Pearl Harbor isn’t tacky.

  • Holes In the Foam
    Holes In the Foam December 7, 2013 at 3:22 pm

    Gary, all due respect, you are talking out your ass.

  • Gary Goodson
    Gary Goodson December 7, 2013 at 4:55 pm

    That is an ad hominem argument. What is your actual refutation?

  • Holes In the Foam
    Holes In the Foam December 7, 2013 at 5:11 pm

    No, it’s a statement of fact Gary. When you babble such ideologue nonsense (which you have done before out here, because you ARE a BLIND IDEOLOGUE), you are indeed talking out of your ass. As for a refutation, are you kidding? Your argument is so asinine (pun intended), it’s not even deserving of a refutation.

    One question though, what if a company is run by a faith-healer goober who doesn’t believe in doctors or medicine or hospitals. Does he get to use his religious views as a way to keep his employees from getting any coverage at all? That would violate his moral views wouldn’t it??

    Please, more ass-talk… we’re waiting. 😀

  • Gary Goodson
    Gary Goodson December 7, 2013 at 5:22 pm

    Article one section eight of the Constitution enumerates what congress can legislate on. The ninth and tenth amendment reserve anything left over to the states. Where in that language is congress given the right to enforce employer insurance mandates period?

  • Holes In the Foam
    Holes In the Foam December 7, 2013 at 5:29 pm

    Yawwwwwnnnnn…

  • Holes In the Foam
    Holes In the Foam December 7, 2013 at 5:30 pm

    In case you’ve forgotten, the ACA is the law of the land. And employers do have the option to not provide coverage and pay a surtax. What are you missing Gary? Oh yeah, nevermind you’re still talking out of your ass.

  • Holes In the Foam
    Holes In the Foam December 7, 2013 at 5:33 pm

    Oh, and while you’re feebly atttempting to obfuscate, address the question that I raised. Don’t think I missed that. 😛

  • Gary Goodson
    Gary Goodson December 7, 2013 at 5:39 pm

    Yes, a surtax that will force them to subsidize a public health plan they find morally objectionable. Personally I’m fine with abortion and contraception but that’s beside the point. I believe in freedom of conscience equally for people who think like me and people who don’t.

  • Gary Goodson
    Gary Goodson December 7, 2013 at 5:41 pm

    Slavery and white male privilege were once the law of the land but that didn’t make them right.

  • Holes In the Foam
    Holes In the Foam December 7, 2013 at 6:58 pm

    Hmmm… and now racism (and sexism) stemming from those days are now a thing of the past? Please… keep the ass-talking going. You’re on a roll. 😛

  • Holes In the Foam
    Holes In the Foam December 7, 2013 at 6:59 pm

    You didn’t answer me Gary. This is your final chance.

  • Holes In the Foam
    Holes In the Foam December 7, 2013 at 7:00 pm

    And no, the surtax doesn’t subsidize a public health plan. Do you know ANYTHING about ACA? Stop watching Fox News, you dolt. There is NO public option.

  • Post a comment

Google no longer supports Google Images API and this plugin can't work.

You can try to use other plugins with the same feature:
WP Picasa Box - http://codecanyon.net/item/wp-picasa-box/16099962
WP Pixabay Search And Insert - http://wpclever.net/downloads/wordpress-pixabay-search-and-insert